1998 Acura Integra vs. 1986 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Acura Integra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 1986 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Acura | Mercury |
Model | Integra | Cougar |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |