1998 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 38 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | Integra | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |