1998 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 356 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | Integra | Celica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1835 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 622 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
