1998 Acura Integra vs. 2006 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 MG ZT-T is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT-T (187 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Acura Integra. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT-T weights approximately 371 kg more than 1998 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZT-T (245 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 2006 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 2006 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Acura | MG |
Model | Integra | ZT-T |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |