1998 Acura Integra vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (140 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (172 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura Integra | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | Integra | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 132 HP |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
