1998 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura Integra (170 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (174 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | Integra | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1835 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |