1998 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sienna is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Sienna (266 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1998 Acura Integra. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Sienna (332 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura Integra. (172 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura Integra. 2012 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1998 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1998 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura Integra | 2012 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | Integra | Sienna |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 332 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3030 mm |