1998 Acura NSX vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1998 Acura NSX is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Acura | DAF |
Model | NSX | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2060 mm |