1998 Acura NSX vs. 1972 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1998 Acura NSX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura NSX (304 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 1972 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | NSX | 160 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |