1998 Acura NSX vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1998 Acura NSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 1998 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura NSX (304 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1998 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | Tempo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |