1998 Acura NSX vs. 1986 Opel Omega
To start off, 1998 Acura NSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1986 Opel Omega. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura NSX (304 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Omega. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1998 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 1986 Opel Omega | |
Make | Acura | Opel |
Model | NSX | Omega |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 79.5 mm |
Top Speed | 268 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2670 mm |