1998 Acura NSX vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1998 Acura NSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1998 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura NSX (304 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1998 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | NSX | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2350 mm |