1998 Acura NSX vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1998 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 1998 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura NSX | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | NSX | Triax |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2790 mm |
