1998 Acura NSX vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura NSX (291 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1998 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 1998 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1998 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 1998 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Acura NSX | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Acura | Honda |
Model | NSX | FCX |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2580 mm |