1998 Acura TL vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Rover 45. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 45.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Acura TL | 2000 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Acura | Rover |
| Model | TL | 45 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4864 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1405 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |
