1998 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1998 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 478 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 145 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1370 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1618 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |
