1998 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 (187 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | 60 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3230 mm |