1998 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 500 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Pontiac |
| Model | 156 | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3130 mm |
