1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 (190 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 232 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (226 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 166 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 5422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 423 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 96.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |
