1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 325 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 166 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
