1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin-Healey |
Model | 166 | Sprite |
Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 27 L |