1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 (155 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (187 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 166 | E |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |