1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 (155 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (187 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 166 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |