1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (136 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Alfa Romeo 166 2010 Mazda 3
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 166 3
Year Released 1998 2010
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2387 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 136 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 304 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1363 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4506 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 60 L