1998 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166.

Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. (187 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo 166. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 has manual transmission. 1998 Alfa Romeo 166 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: