1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 2000 Audi Steppenwolf
To start off, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi Steppenwolf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf (222 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf should accelerate faster than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo.
Because 2000 Audi Steppenwolf is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf (320 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. (223 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Steppenwolf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 2000 Audi Steppenwolf | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | Dardo | Steppenwolf |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 95.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1470 mm |
