1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (223 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Dardo | Tracker |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |