1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (223 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (221 Nm). This means 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Dardo | 6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |