1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (223 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Dardo | 6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |