1998 Alpina B 12 vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1998 Alpina B 12 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1992 Rover 216.
Because 1998 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm). This means 1998 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Alpina B 12 | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Alpina | Rover |
Model | B 12 | 216 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 140 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2560 mm |