1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage weights approximately 42 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage (746 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (422 Nm). This means 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Aston Martin Project Vantage | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Dodge |
| Model | Project Vantage | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 6286 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 746 Nm | 422 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1512 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |
