1998 Aston Martin Vantage vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Aston Martin Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Aston Martin Vantage would be higher. At 5,970 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 810 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Aston Martin Vantage | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Aston Martin | MCC |
Model | Vantage | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 5970 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1810 mm |