1998 Audi A3 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1998 Audi A3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1998 Audi A3. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A3.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi A3 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | A3 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 36 L |
