1998 Audi A6 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi A6 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3210 mm |
