1998 Audi A6 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi A6. (265 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi A6 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2459 cc | 5422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 423 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3210 mm |
