1998 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi A6. (271 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi A6 | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A6 | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
