1998 Audi A6 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,225 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (227 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi A6 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | A6 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2225 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 75 L |
