1998 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2225 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |