1998 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,459 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (265 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2459 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |