1998 Audi A6 vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 3200 CS.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (271 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |