1998 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (271 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 115 Nm |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |