1998 Audi A6 vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1972 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi A6. (225 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Audi | ZIL |
Model | A6 | 114 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2598 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3770 mm |