1998 Audi A6 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi A6. (271 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A6 | Etna |
Year Released | 1998 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 408 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 11.2:1 |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |