1998 Audi A6 vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1998 Audi A6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi A6. (271 Nm). This means 1990 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 77.7 mm |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |