1998 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 2002 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2225 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 107 L |