1998 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,225 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 1998 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | A6 | F1 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2225 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |