1998 Audi A6 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,225 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (227 HP) has 157 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Audi | MCC |
Model | A6 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2225 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 1810 mm |