1998 Audi A6 vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG ZR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (271 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | A6 | ZR |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 123 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |