1998 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,459 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1998 Audi A6. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi A6.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (265 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | A6 | 7 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2459 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2230 mm |