1998 Audi A6 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (271 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |